Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Ilmiah Lingkungan Kebumian (JILK) undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research.

Review Workflow:

1. Initial Screening
   The editorial team reviews each submission for relevance, originality, and adherence to the journal's guidelines.

2. Double-Blind Review
   Suitable manuscripts are sent to at least two independent reviewers. Both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the process.

3. Reviewer Evaluation
   Reviewers assess the manuscript's clarity, methodology, significance, and contribution to the field, and provide recommendations (accept, minor/major revision, or reject).

4. Editorial Decision
   The editor makes a final decision based on reviewers' feedback. Authors may be asked to revise and resubmit their manuscript.

5. Final Review and Publication
   Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated (if necessary), and accepted articles proceed to editing and publication.

JILK is committed to a fair, timely, and constructive peer review process to uphold high academic standards.