Willingness to Accept (WTA) Analysis of Impact Compensation Funds for Transporting Limestone Materials (Case Study: Road Section in Solok Regency, West Sumatra)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31315/mtj.v2i2.12041Keywords:
impact of transportation, compensation funds, willingness to acceptAbstract
Limestone mining activities have a negative impact on the community around the mining location. This impact comes from material transportation activities by transport trucks. The trucks transport materials using public roads. The use of roads results in damage as a result of increased truck traffic and the number of overloaded trucks. The aim of this research is to analyze the cost of compensation funds that will be received by the affected communities. Using the questionnaire method, researchers distributed 66 questionnaires. The number of sample respondents was calculated using the Harry King nomogram formula with an error rate of 10%. To analyze compensation funds using the Willingness To Accept (WTA) approach. Of the 66 respondents, only 62 respondents were willing to accept compensation funds, 4 respondents were not willing to accept it on the grounds that the funds provided were not commensurate with the impact they felt. Using the WTA approach, the estimated average WTA value is IDR 63,000/month/KK and from the estimated average value, the total WTA value that must be paid by the company is IDR 3,900,000 per month. Compensation costs are included in production costs so that they can be a consideration for companies in environmental management.References
Chang, NB, Yang, YC, Wang, SF.(1996). Solid waste management system analysis with noise control and traffic congestion limitations. J. Envir Engrg, ASCE, 122(2), 122–131.
Fauzi, A. (2004). Economics and Natural Resources and Environment, Theory and Applications.Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fauzi,aA. (2010). Resource EconomicsaNature and Environment. Bogor: IPB Press.
Fauzi,aA. (2014). Valuatione Economics and Evaluation Damage to Natural Resources and the Environment. Bogor: IPB Press
Hidayati, T. (2019). Basic Statistics Guide for Lecturers and Students.Purwokerto: CV. Persada Pen
JianJun, Ren Yuan, Du GuoZhen. (2010). The combined application of WTP and WTA in contingent valuation methods. Journal of Environmental Protection, 1. p. 284-292.
P. Seloa, V. Ngole-Jeme. (2022). Community perceptions of the environmental and social impacts of mining in Limpopo South Africa and the implications for corporate social responsibility, J. Integr Sains. 19(1).189–207.
Scott PW, John M. Eyre, David J. Harrison, Ellie J. Steadman.(2003). River mining: aggregate production and supply in developing countries with particular reference to Jamaica. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham. 44 pages.
Sugiyono. (2021). Statistics for Research. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Spash, C. L. (2008). The contingent valuation method: Retrospect and prospect. Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED). Working Paper Series 2007-01, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, ISSN 1834-5638. 26 pages
The Asia Foundation. (2008). Freight Transport Costs, Regulations and Road Charges in Indonesia. Jakarta: The Asia Foundation.
Venkatachalam, L. (2004). The contingent valuation method: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24. p. 89 – 124
Veeramani, C., Sharanya, S. Ebrahimnejad, A. (2020). Optimization for multi-objective sum of linear fractional programming problems: fuzzy nonlinear programming approach. Mathematical Sciences. (14), 219–233.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mining Technology Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
