Corporate Social Responsibility as a Bridge Across Religions: Interactivity and Brand Value
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31315/paradigma.v30i1.16457Kata Kunci:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Brand Co-Creation, Behavior, Perceived Value, Religiosity.Abstrak
Interaktivitas dalam Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) merupakan katalis yang signifikan bagi keterlibatan pelanggan, namun dampaknya di antara berbagai kelompok agama, khususnya dalam gerakan seperti BDS, masih belum cukup diteliti. Penelitian ini mengkaji dampak persepsi interaktivitas CSR terhadap perilaku ko-kreasi merek oleh konsumen dan nilai yang dipersepsikan, dengan menyelidiki peran mediasi perilaku ko-kreasi merek oleh konsumen, sekaligus mengevaluasi perbedaan respons keagamaan. Pendekatan kuantitatif diterapkan dengan menggunakan PLS-SEM untuk menguji pengaruh langsung dan tidak langsung, serta Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) untuk menilai perbedaan antar kelompok. Data dikumpulkan dari 110 pelanggan Starbucks melalui survei daring dengan menggunakan teknik non-probability sampling. Persepsi interaktivitas CSR berdampak positif terhadap perilaku ko-kreasi, sehingga meningkatkan nilai yang dipersepsikan. MGA menunjukkan tidak adanya perbedaan yang signifikan antara pelanggan Muslim dan Kristen, yang mengindikasikan bahwa nilai-nilai CSR yang bersifat universal dapat diterima lintas kelompok agama. Perusahaan sebaiknya merancang program CSR yang inklusif dan interaktif untuk mendorong keterlibatan, membangun hubungan pelanggan yang lebih kuat, serta meningkatkan nilai merek.
Referensi
Awad, R. (2021). BDS as the baseline of solidarity: toward a model of co-struggling with Palestinians in their movement for justice and liberation. Human Geography, 14, 362–373.
Biggemann, S., Williams, M., & Kro, G. (2014). Building in sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2013-0161
Buheji, M., & Ahmed, D. (2023). Keeping the Boycott Momentum-from “WAR on GAZA” Till ’Free-Palestine. International Journal of Management (IJM), 14(7), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NC75D
Chaitin, J., Steinberg, Shoshana, & Steinberg, Sharon. (2017). Polarized words: discourse on the boycott of Israel, social justice and conflict resolution. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(3), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2016-0029
Fahlevi, M. (2023). Economic diplomacy and conflict resolution: Harnessing the economic peace leverage theory in the Palestine-Israel context. Journal of Economics and Business Letters, 3(5), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.55942/jebl.v3i5.249
Fatma, M., Rahman, Z., & Khan, I. (2016). Measuring consumer perception of CSR in tourism industry: Scale development and validation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 27, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.03.002
France, C., Grace, D., Lo Iacono, J., & Carlini, J. (2020). Exploring the interplay between customer perceived brand value and customer brand co-creation behaviour dimensions. Journal of Brand Management, 27(4), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00194-7
France, C., Grace, D., Merrilees, B., & Miller, D. (2018). Customer brand co-creation behavior: conceptualization and empirical validation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-10-2017-0266
Gilsing, R., Turetken, O., Ozkan, B., Grefen, P., Adali, O. E., Wilbik, A., & Berkers, F. (2021). Evaluating the Design of Service-Dominant Business Models: A Qualitative Method. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 36–70. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.13102
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer. http://www.
Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., & Singh, J. J. (2020). Co-creation: A Key Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Trust, and Customer Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4015-y
Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514529187
Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00277.x
Lipari, F. (2018). This Is How We Do It: How Social Norms and Social Identity Shape Decision Making under Uncertainty. Games, 9(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9040099
Neilson, L. A. (2010). Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.313
Palacios Florencio, B., Revilla-Camacho, M. Á., & Garzón-Benítez, L. (2019). The Attitude Towards Boycotts: Determining Factors. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 8(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.3926/hdbr.242
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2016). Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.07.001
Seno, J. P., Pimenta, M. L., Hilletofth, P., & Eriksson, D. (2019). Cross-functional interconnectedness as an enabler of customer value. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(4), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2017-0101
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
Sung, K. S. (Kyong), & Lee, S. (2023). Customer brand co-creation behavior and brand sincerity through CSR interactivity: The role of psychological implications in service-dominant logic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103388
Tommasetti, A., Troisi, O., & Vesci, M. (2017). Measuring customer value co-creation behavior. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(5), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-10-2015-0215
Vargo, S. L. (2020). From promise to perspective: Reconsidering value propositions from a service-dominant logic orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.10.013
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Vitell, S. J. (2015). A Case for Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR): Including a Selected Review of Consumer Ethics/Social Responsibility Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2110-2
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Versi
- 2026-01-31 (4)
- 2026-01-31 (3)
- 2026-01-31 (2)
- 2026-01-31 (1)
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Nurul Retno Hapsari, Virginia Ayu Sagita, Medi Trilaksono Dwi Abadi, Ida Susi Dewanti, Dewi Mukti Wijayanti

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The manuscript submitted to Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, dan Kebijakan journals are released under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial- ShareAlike (CC BY SA) if and when the article is accepted for publication.
We declare that:
- This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
- It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
- A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Authors retain all proprietary rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, dan Kebijakan

