Sikap Jepang Terhadap Korea Selatan Terkait Agreement On Comfort Women 2015

Authors

  • Beti Regina Ratri Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31315/paradigma.v23i2.5016

Keywords:

Jugun Ianfu, Comfort Women, Japan, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Jugun ianfu or comfort women is a term for women who were recruited by the
Japanese Government during the Japanese military occupation in World War II which was used as a slave to sexual of Japanese military. The desire of the victims, especially in South Korea to get responsibility and justice rights for the treatment of Japanese military in the past, demanded that Japan respond to various demand. Japan has tried various responses in fulfilling demands, the one is Agreement on Comfort Women 2015 but there have been various criticisms and rejections of the response so that the problem of this issue cannot be resolved. This article aims to discuss how Japan responds to the demands of ex-comfort women in South Korea. The method used is library research and qualitative research.

References

Perwita Anak Agung Banyu dan Yayan Mochamad Yani. (2005). Pengantar Ilmu

Hubungan Internasional, Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya.

Holsti, K.J. (1998). Politik Internasional: Kerangka Untuk Analisis Jilid 2, Terj. M.

Tahir Azhary, Jakarta, Penerbit Erlangga.

Yoon, Yang Seung dan Nur Aini Setiawati. (2003). Sejarah Korea Sejarah Awal Abad

Hingga Masa Kontemporer, Yogyakarta, Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hartono, Budi, Dadang Juliantoro, Rosalia Sciortino (ed.). (1997). Derita Paksa

Perempuan Kisah Jugun Ianfu Pada Masa Pendudukan Jepang, 1942-1945,

Cetakan 1, Jakarta, Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Bakry, Umar Suryadi, (2017). Metode Penelitian Hubungan Internasional, Edisi 2,

Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Hui, Lim Kim. (2010). Masalah Wanita Penghibur Jugun Ianfu: Antara Kriminalitas,

Martabat Bangsa, Dan Permainan Semantik, dalam Mukhtasar Syamsuddin, Nur

Aini Setiawati, dkk. (ed.), Sejarah Korea Menuju Masyarakat Modern:

Beberapa Peristiwa Penting, Yogyakarta, INAKOS.

Sartini. (2003). Kontradiksi Dalam Asumsi Religiusitas Pada Bangsa Jepang: Telaah

Filosofis Pergeseran Makna Religi, Jurnal Filsafat, 34(2), hal. 147-157.

Witt Ms., Kathryn J. (2016). Comfort Women: The 1946-1948 Tokyo War Crimes

Trials and Historical Blindness, The Great Lakes Journal of Undergraduate

History, 4(1), 15-33.

Suliyati, Titiek. (2018). Jugun Ianfu: Derita Perempuan Dalam Pusaran Perang, Jurnal

Kiryoku, 2(3), 41-49.

Dudden, Alexis dan K Mizoguchi. (2007). Abe’s Violent Denial: Japan’s Prime

Minister and the Comfort Women, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 5(3), 1-2.

Adityani, Fiandara Dwi. (2008). Memori Dan Trauma Dalam Hubungan Internasional:

Pengaruh Isu Comfort Women Terhadap Kerjasama Keamanan Jepang Dan

Korea Selatan, Journal of International Relations, 4(1), 22-30.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-01

How to Cite

Ratri, B. R. (2019). Sikap Jepang Terhadap Korea Selatan Terkait Agreement On Comfort Women 2015. Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, Dan Kebijakan, 23(2), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.31315/paradigma.v23i2.5016

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 2 (2019): Juli 2019

Section

International Relations

License

The manuscript submitted to Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, dan Kebijakan journals are released under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial- ShareAlike (CC BY SA) if and when the article is accepted for publication.

We declare that:

  1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
  2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
  3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.

 

Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions

Authors retain all proprietary rights  to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

  1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  2. The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
  3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
  4. The right to self-archive the article 

The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, dan Kebijakan