Focus and Scope

• SECURITY AND DEFENCE
• DIPLOMACY
• INTERNATIONAL LAW
• HUMAN RIGHTS
• SOCIAL AND CULTURE
• POLITICAL ECONOMIC
• ENVIRONMENT (GREEN POLITIC)

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The Policies Regarding on the Peer Review Proccess in Jurnal Pena Wimaya Consists of :

1. The Article from the Author will be Reviewed by the Reviewer.
2. Review process employs Double-blind Review, that the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.
3. In the review process, reviewers consider the correspondence of title, abstract, research method, discussion (findings) and conclusions. In addition, reviewers also consider the novelty, scientific impact and references used in the paper.

The response of the reviewers will be the basis for the Editor to conclude:

1. Accept Submission
2. Revisions Required
3. Resubmit for review
4. Resubmit elsewhere
5. Decline Submission

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jurnal Pena Wimaya

Pena Wimaya (Publikasi E-Journal Hubungan Internasional) adalah Jurnal yang mempublikasikan kajian mengenai isu-isu hubungan internasional. Jurnal ini dibuat untuk memfasilitasi dan juga menjadi wadah pemikiran kritis dan positif bagi mahasiswa yang ingin mempublikasikan karya tulis ilmiahnya. Tim Redaksi dari Jurnal Pena Wimaya merupakan Mahasiswa Hubungan Internasional UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta yang telah melalui tahap seleksi oleh dosen pembimbing. Dengan adanya Pena Wimaya, diharap mahasiswa mampu untuk berani dalam mempublikasikan hasil pemikiran yang telah ditempa dalam kehidupan perkuliahan, hal ini juga sekaligus implementasi dari nilai-nilai widya mwat yasa

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Pena Wimaya is a peer-reviewed journal published Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Pena Wimaya is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society. 

Duties of Publisher

Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta as the publisher of Jurnal Pena Wimaya takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta, and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Pena Wimaya is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Plagiarism Screening

Tim Redaksi Pena Wimaya berhak untuk menolak artikel/naskah yangg masuk dari penulis yang total jumlah plagiarismenya lebih dari 30 persen. Berikut ialah mekanisme plagiarisme yang dilakukan dan yang digunakan untuk memastikan bahwa artikel/naskah siap untuk dipublikasikan.

1. Artikel Naskah merupakan karya original yang dibuktikan dengan cek plagiarisme oleh tim redaksi
2. Editor bisa menolak artikel secara sepihak apabila artikel terbukti merupakan artikel kepemilikan orang lain (bukan author yang bersangkutan)
3. Editor berhak meminta revisi maksimal 2 kali untuk permasalahan plagiarisme apabila plagiarisme lebih dari 30% dan kurang dari 50%
4. Apabila dalam 2 kali revisi dari author masih lebih dari 30% plagiarismenya, maka keputusan akan ditentukan oleh tim editor melalui rapat terbatas
5. Tim Redaksi berhak menolak artikel/naskah author yang melebihi 50% cek plagiarisme dari turnitin

Call For Reviewer

The editor of Pena Wimaya invites you to become a reviewer on Journal Pena Wimaya, published by Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Please Click Form