PREDICTION OF ”RATE OF PENETRATION” (ROP) ON DRILLING FORMATION ”X” PROGNOSIS WELL ”YN2” BASED ON THE REPRESENTATIVE MODELLING FROM DRILLING FORMATION ”X’’ ACTUAL WELL ’’YN1’’ FIELD ’’IP’’

KRT. Nur Suhascaryo, Sudarmoyo Sudarmoyo, Inrianto Pratomo

Abstract


Prediction value of the rate of penetration (ROP) in the drilling of the formation “X” well prognosis "YN2" in the field “IP” and the actual well "YN1" as a review of the selection of a representative Model-ROP at a depth of 2620 mbpl - 3000 mbpl in the "IP" field ". This study selected a representative Model-ROP from drilling the "X" formation of the actual well "YN1" in the "IP" field then predicting the rate of penetration (ROP) value in the drilling of the "X" formation of the "YN2" prognosis well in the "IP" field. ROPs used in this study include the Bingham Model (1966), Teale (2008) and Mottahari (2010). Prediction of the rate of penetration (ROP) value in the drilling of the "X" formation well "YN2" prognosis is done in stages including predicting the rate of penetration (ROP) value in the drilling of the "X" formation of the actual well "YN1" by collecting data including data on "YN1" actual well drilling includes bit records, drilling reports, well programs, and well profiles and then predicts the rate of penetration (ROP) value in the drilling of the "X" well formation "YN2" using drilling prognosis. Determine the drilling parameters needed to predict the value of the rate of penetration (ROP) has a difference in each model. In the Bingham model the parameters required include MD, WOB, RPM, T, and d-exp values. In the Teale model the required drilling parameters contain the actual MD, WOB, RPM, T, DB, and ROP values, MSE, μ and AB. In the Mottahari Model, the drilling parameters needed for MD, WOB, RPM, T, DB, actual ROP, σ, Wf (use function), G (model coefficients representing drillability), a = 0.50 and y = 1,50 is obtained from assumptions. In the Bingham Model has a coordination coefficient value (R2) = 0.9985, the Teale Model has a coordination coefficient value (R2) = 1 and the Mottahari Model has a co-coefficient value (R2) = 1. The ROP model that represents the drilling of the "X" formation Actual wells "YN1" can all be used or all Model-ROPs represent to predict the value of the penetration rate (ROP) in drilling the "X" formation prognosis of the well "YN2". Calculate the estimated penetration rate (ROP) in the drilling of the "X" formation prognosis of the well "YN2" using the Bingham, Teale and Mottahari models through the prognosis of the drilling "YN2".


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, J. Neal, 1985, ”Drilling Engineering A Complete Well Planning Approach“, Penwell Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Armenta Miguel, 2008, “Identifying Inefficient Drilling Conditions Using Drilling-Spesific Energy”, SPE EPT-WT, Colorado USA.

A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr, F.S. Young, Jr., 1974, “ A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection”, Louisiana State A, LA

Chiranth Hegde*, Cesar Soares, and Ken Gray, 2018, “ Rate Of Penetration (ROP) Modeling Using Hybrid Models: Deterministic And Machine Learning”, The University of Texas at Austin.

Gatlin, Carl., 1960, “Drilling and Well Completions”, Department of Petroleum University, The University of Texas.

H.R. Mottahari, G.Hareland, 2010, “Improved Drilling Efficiency Technique Using Integrated PDM and PDC Bit Parameters, SPE, University of Calgary, Saudi Aramco.

H.R.Mottahari, G.Hareland, R.Nygaard, 2009, “Method of Optimizing Motor and Bit Performance for Maximum ROP” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Departure Energy Services Inc, University of Calgary, Canada.

Elkatatny, S.M. Tariq, Z and Mahmoud, M.A., Al-AbdulJabbar, A., 2017, “Optimization of Rate of Penetration Using Artificial Intelligent Techniques”, American Rock Mechanics Association, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Hareland, G., WU, A. and Rashidi, B., James, J.A., 2010, “ A New Drilling Rate Model for Tri-Cone Bit and Its Application to Predict Rock Compressive Strength”, University of Calgary, Husky Energy, Canada

Malik Alsenwar, 2017, “NCS Drilling Data Based ROP Modelling and its Application” Petroleum Engineering/Drilling Engineering Department, Universiteteti Stavanger, Norwegia.

Mohammed Ayoub, Goh Shien, Diab Diab and Quosay Ahmed, 2017, “Modeling of Drilling Rate of Penetration Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System”, Petroleum Engineering Department, University Teknologi, Petronas Bandar Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.

Rubiandini, R., 1993, “Teknik Pemboran I & II”, Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Rubiandini, R., 2001, “Teknik Pemboran Lanjut”, Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Stephen Ernst, Paul Pastusek, Paul Lutes, Hughes Christensen, 2007, “Effect of RPM and ROP on PDC Bit Steerability”, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

T.M. Warren, 1987, “Penetration-Rate Performance of Roller-Cone Bits”, SPE-Amoco Production Co,

W. C. Maurer, 1962, “The "Perfect - Cleaning" Theory of Rotary Drilling”, Jersey Production Research Co., Tulsa, Oklahoma.

______Bit Record “YN1” Lapangan “IP”, 2017, PT. Pertamina EP Asset 3.

______Drilling Report “YN1” Lapangan “IP”, 2017, PT. Pertamina EP Asset 3.

______Drilling Program “YN1” Lapangan “IP”, 2017, PT. Pertamina EP Asset 3.

______Drlling Prognosis “YN2” Lapangan “IP”, 2019, PT. Pertamina EP Asset 3.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Creative Commons License
Techno LPPM by http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/teknoslppm is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats