Vol 14 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan
Artikel

JAPANESE GOVERNMENT REASONS BEHIND THE REMOVAL OF SOUTH KOREA FROM PREFERENTIAL WHITELIST: A MERCANTILISM PERSPECTIVE

Rafidhia Putri Hendarjat
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Arie Kusuma Paksi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Cover JSDK 14(2)

Diterbitkan 2022-07-15

Abstrak

After a series of mutual whitelist exemption between the East Asian countries, Japan and South Korea since the second half of 2019, the happening of trade dispute cannot be avoided. This study aims to find the reasons behind the Japanese government decision to remove South Korea from Japan’s preferential whitelist. Through qualitative method, this study uses the mercantilism perspective of International Political Economy (IPE) combined with historical perspective of Japan and South Korea since their first encounter during the timeline of World War until the present day, especially through economic context as the theoretical framework. Therefore, this study asserts that Japan, as a country which claimed that it applied trade liberalization, also have the mercantilism ideas projection on their foreign policy by intervening the economic activities of the state, in which economy – as a form of soft power – is a crucial factor to make Japan as a strong state and crucial actor in international political stage, as the rivalry in global technology market with South Korea and strategic alliance with the United States needs to be prioritized by the Japanese government in order to protect its national interest as a state with a strong economy power after the massive economic growth of its fellow East Asian country, South Korea, and the high interdependency with South Korea especially in the 2000s era. The hypothesis can be proven through the weakening of South Korea technology and electronic integrated circuit export after their removal from Japan’s preferential whitelist and the growing favoritism by the United States, which made the Japanese government successfully achieve their national interest.

Referensi

  1. Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (E. D. Lestari (ed.); 1st ed.). CV. Jejak.
  2. Asian Development Bank. (2020). 2020 Asian Development Bank Annual Report. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/FLS210109
  3. Asih, K. N., & Suksmonohadi, M. (2019). Ketegangan Jepang-Korea Selatan dan Dampaknya pada Perekonomian. In Departemen Internasional (Ed.), Perkembangan Ekonomi Keuangan dan Kerjasama Internasional (III, pp. 113–117). Bank Indonesia. http://www.lib.ibs.ac.id/repository/PEKKI-Edisi-III-2019.pdf
  4. BBC News. (2015). “Comfort women”: Japan and South Korea Hail Agreement. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35190464
  5. Bermingham, F., & Jeong-ho, L. (2019, August 23). South Korea’s Economy Facing ‘Perfect Storm’ as Japan Trade Dispute Continues and Exports Plunge. https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-economy/article/3023957/south-koreas-economy-facing-perfect-storm-japan-trade
  6. Bolton, J. R. (2020, August 28). Abe Will be Missed. He Tethered Trump Somewhere Next to Reality. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/08/28/john-bolton-shinzo-abe-trump/
  7. Booth, A., & Deng, K. (2017). Japanese Colonialism in Comparative Perspective. Journal of World History, 28(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2017.0002
  8. Choi, B., & Oh, J. S. (2021). Politics of East Asian Free Trade Agreements. In Politics of East Asian Free Trade Agreements (1st Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298585
  9. Cohn, T. H. (2016). Global Political Economy (7th Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659695
  10. Deacon, C. (2021). (Re)producing the ‘History Problem’: Memory, Identity and the Japan-South Korea Trade Dispute. Pacific Review, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1897652
  11. Drezner, D. (2021). Power and International Relations: a Temporal View. European Journal of International Relations, 27(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120969800
  12. Endo, H. (2019). Japan Strengthening Export Controls against South Korea, May Leave China as Sole Winner in 5G Competition. https://grici.or.jp/320
  13. Envall, H. (2017). Japan: From Passive Partner to Active Ally. In M. Wesley (Ed.), Global Allies: Comparing US Alliances in the 21st Century (pp. 15–30).
  14. Hattori, R., & Leonard, G. B. (2021). Eisaku Satō , Japanese Prime Minister, 1964-72: Okinawa, Foreign Relations, Domestic Politics and the Novel Prize (1st ed.). Routledge.
  15. Hook, G. D., Gilson, J., Hughes, C. W., & Dobson, H. (2012). Japan’s International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security (3rd ed., Vol. 44). Routledge.
  16. Hosoe, N. (2021). Impact of Tighter Controls on Japanese Chemical Exports to Korea. Economic Modelling, 94(January), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.006
  17. International Monetary Fund. (2021). Japan and the IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/JPN
  18. Japan External Trade Organization. (2004). 2004 JETRO White Paper on International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/en/reports/white_paper/2004.pdf.
  19. Japan External Trade Organization. (2019). Japan-U.S. Investment Report. https://www.jetro.go.jp/usa/japan-us-investment-report-2020.html
  20. Kalinova, K. (2020, February 17). Japan–South Korea Tensions Show Little Sign of Easing. The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/japan-south-korea-tensions
  21. Kim, G. (2017). Korea’s Economic Relations with Japan. Korea’s Economy, 31, 23–29.
  22. Kim, K. (2020, February 12). Japan Takes Issue with Hyundai Heavy-Daewoo Shipbuilding Deal. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200212009800320
  23. Kim, T. (2019, August 3). Thousands of South Koreans Protest Japanese Trade Curbs. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/d504e9e3dd504ed5801a69d3f3abe17b
  24. Kuong, T. (2018). Legal Assistance in the Japanese ODA: The Spark of a New Era. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 5(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.31
  25. Magnusson, L. (2015). The Political Economy of Mercantilism. The Political Economy of Mercantilism, 1–230. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694511
  26. METI of Japan. (2020). The WTO Panel Came to a Decision that the Republic of Korea’s Measure for Extending Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel Bars Originating from Japan is Inconsistent with the WTO Agreement. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2020/1201_001.html
  27. METI of Japan. (2021a). Internal Compliance Programs (ICPs). http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/anpo/englishpage/icp.pdf
  28. METI of Japan. (2021b). Update of METI’s Licensing Policies and Procedures in Relation to the Republic of Korea. https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/external_economy/export_control_korea/index-en.html
  29. Ministry of Finance of Japan. (2021). Total Value of Exports and Imports (1950-). https://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/suii/html/nenbet_e.htm
  30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2017). U.S.-Japan Alliance Joint Statement. https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000227768.pdf
  31. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2020). Issuance of Panel Report on “Korea – Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel Bars” in the WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings. https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press6e_000252.html
  32. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2021). ODA and the Asian Currency and Financial Crisis. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1998/3.html
  33. Nye, J. (2017). Soft Power: the Origins and Political Progress of a Concept. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 2016–2018. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.8
  34. O’Brien, R. C. (2021). A Free and Open Indo-Pacific. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OBrien-Expanded-Statement.pdf
  35. Park, C. H. (2019). Expanding Spirals of South Korea-Japan Conflict. Atlantic Council, 4–7. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep20930.5
  36. Rosyidin, M. (2014). Soft Diplomacy SBY dalam Konflik Indonesia-Malaysia Soft Diplomacy SBY dalam Konflik Indonesia-Malaysia: Studi Kebijakan SBY terhadap Pelanggaran Kedaulatan oleh Malaysia di Perairan Bintan Tahun 2010. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 5(1), 3–22.
  37. Shin, M. (2021). Conflict Between South Korea and Japan Surges Again With Court’s ‘Comfort Women’ Decision. https://thediplomat.com/2021/01/conflict-between-south-korea-and-japan-surges-again-with-courts-comfort-women-decision/
  38. Sugihara, J. (2019). Japan Officially Ousts South Korea from Export Whitelist. https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Japan-South-Korea-rift/Japan-officially-ousts-South-Korea-from-export-whitelist
  39. Sugiyama, S. (2020). PM Suga Talks with Moon for First Time but Signals No Fresh Start. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/09/24/national/politics-diplomacy/japan-suga-south-korea-moon-first-call/
  40. Takenaka, K., Leussink, D., & Dolan, D. (2020, August 31). Japan’s Abe Tells Trump Strengthening of Alliance Will Not Change. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-politics-abe-trump-idUSKBN25R0BW
  41. The Global Economy. (2021). South Korea High-tech Exports. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/South-Korea/High_tech_exports/
  42. The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2021). South Korea (KOR) and Japan (JPN) Trade. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/kor/partner/jpn?dynamicBilateralTradeSelector=year2001
  43. Trend Economy. (2021). Annual International Trade Statistics by Country (HS02): Korea. https://trendeconomy.com/data/h2/Korea/8542
  44. Wi, T., & Chang, I. (2016, March 23). “1965 Korea-Japan agreement should be re-estimated.” https://www.korea.net/NewsFocus/History/view?articleId=134245
  45. World Bank. (2017). Top 8 Countries Voting Power. https://finances.worldbank.org/Shareholder-Equity/Top-8-countries-voting-power/udm3-vzz9
  46. World Trade Organization. (2018, December 12). DS571: Korea — Measures Affecting Trade in Commercial Vessels (Japan). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds571_e.htm
  47. World Trade Organization. (2019, April 26). DS495: Korea — Import Bans, and Testing and Certification Requirements for Radionuclides. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds495_e.htm
  48. World Trade Organization. (2020, March 27). DS594: Korea - Measures Affecting Trade in Commercial Vessels (second complaint) (Japan). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds594_e.htm
  49. Yamazaki, M., Yang, H., & Park, J. (2019, July 8). The High-tech Trade Dispute Rooted in Japan’s Wartime History. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-japan-laborers-explainer-idUSKCN1U31D1
  50. Yang, H. (2019). South Korea Removes Japan from Fast-track Trade “White list.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-japan-whitelist-idUKKBN1W21T2
  51. Yang, H., & Park, J. (2019). Japan-South Korea Gloom Spurs Worries of “Never Seen Before” Chip Price Spike. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-japan-laborers-chips-analy/japan-south-korea-gloom-spurs-worries-of-neverseen-before-chip-price-spike-idUSKCN1UD0ZL
  52. Yani, Y. M., & Lusiana, E. (2018). Soft Power dan Soft Diplomacy. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 14(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v14i2.3165
  53. Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif Dalam Perspektif Bimbingan dan Konseling. Quanta, 3(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497
  54. Zhang, M. (2018). Proceeding in Hardship: the Trilateralism–Bilateralism Nexus and the Institutional Evolution of China–Japan–South Korea Trilateralism. Pacific Review, 31(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1310751