Identitas Keindonesiaan dalam Pidato Soekarno pada 1 Juni 1945

Authors

  • Anang Sujoko Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik, Universitas Brawijaya Jl. Veteran Malang 1, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia
  • Fidelis Anggiornamento Saintio Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik, Universitas Brawijaya Jl. Veteran Malang 1, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia
  • Dicky Wahyudi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik, Universitas Brawijaya Jl. Veteran Malang 1, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v19i2.4609

Keywords:

Kolonialisme, Soekarno, Third Space of Communication, Hermeneutika

Abstract

Kolonialisme menghilangkan jati diri dan kepribadian Indonesia, karena penjajahan identik dengan hegemoni kebudayaan dan pemikiran stereotip. Untuk melawan praktik ini, Soekarno telah merintis pemikiran yang menonjolkan identitas bangsa Indonesia. Kristalisasi pemikiran ini tertuang dalam pidato 1 Juni 1945. Tujuan dari penelitian untuk membongkar third space of communication pidato Soekarno dalam membangun identitas bangsa Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis hermeneutika untuk mengetahui usaha apa yang dilakukan oleh Soekarno untuk menemukan identitas bangsa Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pidato 1 Juni 1945 adalah ruang komunikasi bersama untuk memfasilitasi nilai-nilai dan kebudayaan yang berbeda di Indonesia. Pertemuan nilai dan kebudayaan tersebut pada akhirnya berujung pada penemuan identitas bangsa dan narasi untuk melawan hegemoni kolonialisme. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengayaan konsep third space of communication sebagai kajian Ilmu Komunikasi pada fenomena komunikasi di Indonesia.

Author Biography

Fidelis Anggiornamento Saintio, Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik, Universitas Brawijaya Jl. Veteran Malang 1, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia

Magister Ilmu Komunikasi

FISIP - Universitas Brawijaya

References

Adams, C. (1965). Sukarno; an Authobiography as Told to Cindy Adams. Toppan Printing.

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities. Verso. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgs0c0q.10

Bhabha, H. (1990). Nation and Narration. Routledge.

Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture (H. Bhabha, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Cook, V., & Wei, L. (2009). Contemporary Applied Linguistic; Language Teaching and Learning (V. Cook & L. Wei, Eds.). Continuum.

Dahm, B., & van der Kroef, J. (1969). Soekarno: the Ideologue. Pacific Affairs, 42(1), 55–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3350794

Darby, P. (2018). The multiple identities of the postcolonial: Tracking the making of our project. Postcolonial Studies, 21(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1493967

Dewantara, A. (2015). Pancasila dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia. Studia Philosophica et Theologica, 15(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/8r7h9

do Mar Castro Varela, M., & Tamayo Rojas, C. (2020). Epistemicide, postcolonial resistance and the state. Postcolonial Studies, 23(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2020.1751913

Fennell, C. (2018). Beyond the trace. Postcolonial Studies, 21(4), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1542581

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Galvan-Alvarez, E., Laursen, O. B., & Ridda, M. (2020). Decolonising the state: subversion, mimicry and criminality. Postcolonial Studies, 23(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2020.1752356

Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory; A Critical Introduction. Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n435

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action; Lifeworld and System: a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020166-6

Hargens, B. (2019, November 6). Merawat Ingatan. Kompas, 6.

Huddart, D. (2006). Homi K. Bhabha. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05386-2_3

Huddart, D. (2007). Postcolonial Theory and Autobiography. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203306574

Ismail, F. (2018). Religion, State, and Ideology in Indonesia: a Historical Account of the Acceptance of Pancasila As the Basis of Indonesian State. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies, 1(2), 19–58. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijiis.vol1.iss2.art2

Jaya, I. (2016). Nalar pancasila dalam komunikasi politik. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2).

Jensen, K. B. (2018). The Double Hermeneutics of Communication Research. Javnost - The Public, 25(1–2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418968

Latif, Y. (2018a). Identitas Keindonesiaan dan Aktualisasi Pancasila bagi Generasi Milenial di Era Digital. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 33, 5–19. http://jurnal.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/jkl/article/view/112

Latif, Y. (2018b). Religiosity, Nationality, and Sociality of Pancasila: Toward Pancasila through Soekarno’s Way. Studia Islamika, 25(2), 207–246. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v25i2.7502

Liberman, K. (1984). Trustees of Indiana University Anthropological Linguistics. The Hermeneutics of Intercultural Communication, 26(1), 53–83.

Mahfud, M. D. (2020, January 1). Tidak Ada Islamofobia di Indonesia. Kompas, 6.

McLeod, J. (2007). The Routledge Companion to Postcolonial Studies (J. McLeod, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358085

Mueller-Vollmer, K. (Ed.). (1987). The Hermeneutics Reader (Vol. 38, Issue 3). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.2307/590701

Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics; Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483347660.n326

Pamungkas, P. (2018). Lingkaran hermeneutika dan pancasila. Caritas pro Serviam, 36(1), 16–27.

Pawito, P., Muktiyo, W., & Arifin, H. (2020). Nilai Budaya dan Gaya Komunikasi Warga Minangkabau, Jawa, dan Bugis. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 17(3), 249. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v17i3.3775

Raj, P. P. E. (2014). Postcolonial Literature , Hybridity and Culture. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies (IJHSSS), 1(2), 125–128. http://www.ijhsss.com

Rangan, P., & Chow, R. (2013). Race, Racism, and Postcoloniality. The Oxford Handbook of Postcolonial Studies, September, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588251.013.0025

Rodriguez, A. (2018). A case against colonialism. Postcolonial Studies, 21(2), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1474705

Romadlan, S. (2020). Diskursus Negara Pancasila di Kalangan Muhammadiyah. Sospol: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Rutazibwa, O., & Shilliam, R. (2012). Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Politics (O. Rutazibwa & R. Shilliam, Eds.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148433

Rutherford, J. (Ed.). (1990). Indentity; Community, Culture, Difference. Lawrence & Wishart. https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004

Said, E. (2010). Orientalisme; Menggugat Hegemoni Barat dan Mendudukkan Timur sebagai SUbjek. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sari, D. K., & Krisnawati, E. (2017). The Spread of Nationalism using Social Media. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(3), 226. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v15i3.2174

Seran, A. (2015). Hermeneutika sebagai Acuan Kritik Ideologi Sejarah Orde Baru. Respons, 20(2), 145–185.

Shanguhyia, M. S., & Falola, T. (2018). The Palgrave handbook of African colonial and postcolonial history. In The Palgrave Handbook of African Colonial and Postcolonial History. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59426-6

Siswoyo, D. (2013a). Pandangan Bung Karno Tentang Pancasila Dan Pendidikan. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 5(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i1.1264

Siswoyo, D. (2013b). Philosophy of education in Indonesia: Theory and thoughts of institutionalized state (Pancasila). Asian Social Science, 9(12), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p136

Soekarno. (n.d.). Indonesia Menggugat. Departemen Penerangan RI.

Soekarno. (1964a). Di Bawah Bendera Revolusi. Departemen Penerangan RI.

Soekarno. (1964b). Tjamkan Pantjasila. Departemen Penerangan RI.

Syahputra, A. (2015). Pemikiran Pluralisme Ir. Soekarno. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga.

Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. In Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427

Widdowson, H. G. (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press.

Winartono, W., Antoni, A., & Sujoko, A. (2019). Membumikan Ilmu Komunikasi di Indonesia (Pembacaan Hermeneutik Gadamerian atas Tulisan-Tulisan M. Alwi Dahlan). Mediakom, 2(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.32528/mdk.v2i2.1922

Young, R. J. C. (2003). Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Yunaldi, W. (2020). The Dynamic Interpretation of Pancasila in Indonesian State Administration History: Finding Its Authentic Interpretation. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 11(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i1.a15166

Zhou, V. X., & Pilcher, N. (2019). Tapping the thirdness in the intercultural space of dialogue. Language and Intercultural Communication, 19(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1545025

Downloads

Published

2021-10-07

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Artikel

License

Authors who publish articles in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright remains with the author and gives rights to the Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi as the priority to publish the article with an Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional License, which allows the article to be shared with acknowledgment of the author of the article and this journal as the place of publication.
  2. Authors can distribute the publication of their articles on a non-exclusive basis (for example: on university repositories or books) with notification or acknowledgment of publication in the journal Option
  3. Authors are allowed to post their work online (for example: on personal websites or in university repositories) before and after the submission process (see The Effect of Open Access)

Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional License.