Decision making for the selection of vegetable suppliers for foods distributors uses AHP and TOPSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v17i1.9872Keywords:
Supplier Selection, Decision-Making, AHP, TOPSIS, Perishable ProductAbstract
The evaluation of supplier selection is an important aspect that needs to be considered in supply chain management. The best suppliers contribute to a more efficient supply chain system. Companies operating in the food distribution sector are particularly attentive to their suppliers. One of the products that receives significant attention is spinach, a perishable item, making supplier evaluation crucial. This research aims to evaluate the supplier selection of spinach products based on several criteria, such as delivery, quality, price, service, and location. Weighting is done using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In this case, assessment or weighting is carried out by distributing questionnaires to three respondents in the field. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is employed to determine the rankings of each alternative. The results of this study indicate that the price criterion has the highest weight with a weight of 0.39. The recommended selected alternative is alternative 4, with the highest average value (Vi) based on the assessments of three experts. This model proves capable of addressing the issues of supplier selection evaluation, leading to the selection of alternative or supplier 4 as the spinach supplier for the food distribution company.References
Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh, “Selecting the best supplier using AHP method,” African J. Bus. Manag., vol. 6, no. 4, 2012, doi: 10.5897/ajbm11.2009.
S. M. S. Tonekaboni and K. Shahroudi, “Application of Topsis Method To Supplier Selection in Iran Auto Supply Chain,” J. Glob. Strateg. Manag., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 123–123, 2012, doi: 10.20460/jgsm.2012615779.
Y. Beikkhakhian, M. Javanmardi, M. Karbasian, and B. Khayambashi, “The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 42, no. 15–16, pp. 6224–6236, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.035.
F. Tahriri, M. R. Osman, A. Ali, R. M. Yusuff, and A. Esfandiary, “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–76, 2008, doi: 10.3926/jiem.2008.v1n2.p54-76.
E. Onder and S. Dag, “Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process and Topsis Approaches For Supplier Selection in A Cable Company,” J. Business, Econ. Financ., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 19, 2013.
M. Cho, M. A. Bonn, L. Giunipero, and J. S. Jaggi, “Supplier selection and partnerships: Effects upon restaurant operational and strategic benefits and performance,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 94, no. January, p. 102781, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102781.
S. H. Ghodsypour and C. O’Brien, “The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00093-7.
J. Muhammad, D. Rahmanasari, J. Vicky, W. A. Maulidiyah, W. Sutopo, and Y. Yuniaristanto, “Pemilihan Supplier Biji Plastik dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” J. INTECH Tek. Ind. Univ. Serang Raya, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 99–106, 2020, doi: 10.30656/intech.v6i2.2418.
O. Jadidi, F. Firouzi, and E. Bagliery, “TOPSIS method for supplier selection problem,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 47, pp. 956–958, 2010.
M. Dr. Lukman S, S.Si, S.Psi., SE., Supply Chain Management. CV. Cahaya Bintang Cemerlang.
D. M. Utama, “AHP and TOPSIS Integration for Green Supplier Selection: A Case Study in Indonesia,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1845, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1845/1/012015.
M. A. Cherier and S. M. Meliani, “Supplier selection on agrifood supply chain: a Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS methodology,” Int. J. Knowl. Eng. Data Min., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 307, 2019, doi: 10.1504/ijkedm.2019.105244.
R. R. Menon and V. Ravi, “Using AHP-TOPSIS methodologies in the selection of sustainable suppliers in an electronics supply chain,” Clean. Mater., vol. 5, no. September 2021, p. 100130, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clema.2022.100130.
E. B. Tirkolaee, Z. Dashtian, G. W. Weber, H. Tomaskova, M. Soltani, and N. S. Mousavi, “An integrated decision-making approach for green supplier selection in an agri-food supply chain: Threshold of robustness worthiness,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1–30, 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9111304.
S. T. Rahayu, A. Asgar, I. M. Hidayat, and D. Djuariah, “Quality Evaluation of Some Genotype of Spinach ( Amaranthus sp .) Cultivated in West Java,” Ber. Biol. 12(2), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2013.
H. Lau, P. K. C. Shum, D. Nakandala, Y. Fan, and C. Lee, “A game theoretic decision model for organic food supplier evaluation in the global supply chains,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 242, p. 118536, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118536.
S. Zakeri, P. Chatterjee, N. Cheikhrouhou, and D. Konstantas, “Ranking based on optimal points and win-loss-draw multi-criteria decision-making with application to supplier evaluation problem,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 191, no. November 2021, p. 116258, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116258.
R. Ramlan, E. M. N. Engku Abu Bakar, F. Mahmud, and H. K. Ng, “The Ideal Criteria of Supplier Selection for SMEs Food Processing Industry,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 70, no. January, 2016, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20167005006.
R. Magdalena, “Supplier Selection for Food Industry: A Combination of Taguchi Loss Function and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Asian J. Technol. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2012.
N. Banaeian, H. Mobli, B. Fahimnia, I. E. Nielsen, and M. Omid, “Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry,” Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 89, pp. 337–347, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015.
L. Abdullah, W. Chan, and A. Afshari, “Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions,” J. Ind. Eng. Int., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 271–285, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z.
M. Segura, C. Maroto, B. Segura, and J. C. Casas-Rosal, “Improving food supply chain management by a sustainable approach to supplier evaluation,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: 10.3390/math8111952.
S. Wardah, “Model Pemilihan Pemasok Bahan Baku Kelapa Parut Kering dengan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus PT. Kokonako Indonesia),” J. Optimasi Sist. Ind., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 352, 2016, doi: 10.25077/josi.v12.n2.p352-357.2013.
L. Lukmandono, M. Basuki, M. J. Hidayat, and V. Setyawan, “Pemilihan Supplier Industri Manufaktur Dengan Pendekatan AHP dan TOPSIS,” Opsi, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 83, 2019, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v12i2.3146.
A. Muhardono and R. Isnanto, “Penerapan Metode AHP dan Fuzzy Topsis Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 2014, doi: 10.21456/vol4iss2pp108-115.
V. Jain, A. K. Sangaiah, S. Sakhuja, N. Thoduka, and R. Aggarwal, “Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 555–564, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2533-z.
Ž. Stević, I. Tanackov, M. Vasiljević, B. Novarlić, and G. Stojić, “An integrated fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation,” Serbian J. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2016, doi: 10.5937/sjm11-10452.
H. F. E. Septiani Winnie, SD Triwulandari, “Analisis Keputusan,” 1st ed., Yogyakarta: PT Nas Media Indonesia, 2021, p. 218.
M. Zoghi, G. Rostami, A. Khoshand, and F. Motalleb, “Material selection in design for deconstruction using Kano model, fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 410–419, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0734242X211013904.
R. Hruška, P. Průša, and D. Babić, “The use of AHP method for selection of supplier,” Transport, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2014, doi: 10.3846/16484142.2014.930928.
P. Wangchen Bhutia, “Application of ahp and topsis method for supplier selection problem,” IOSR J. Eng., vol. 02, no. 10, pp. 43–50, 2012, doi: 10.9790/3021-021034350.
J. Infokum, “Decision support system to choose,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 196–205, 2021.
H. Aulawi, R. A. Riansyah, and R. Kurniawati, “Analysis of the selection of shoe raw material suppliers by fuzzy TOPSIS method,” vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3983–3990, 2020.
S. Chakraborty, “TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 2, no. September 2021, p. 100021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish articles in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright remains with the author and gives the Opsi journal the right as a priority to publish its articles with Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Which allows articles to be shared with acknowledgement of the author of the article and this journal as the place of publication.
- Authors can distribute their articles on a non-exclusive basis (e.g. in university repositories or books) with notification or acknowledgement of publication in Opsi journals.
- Authors are allowed to post their work online (e.g. on a personal website or in a university repository) before and after the submission process (see The Effect of Open Access)
This work is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.