Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Ilmiah Lingkungan Kebumian (JILK) is a journal that is open-access and reviewed in a double-blind peer-reviewed by a peer reviewer. JLK is biannually published in Maret and September by the Department of Environmental Engineering. Manuscripts/articles published by JILK are the results of original research in the field of environmental management in mining, oil, gas, and geothermal industry; regional development and disaster mitigation; and in a wide range of environmental science and technology

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Abstract and Article

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

PROSES NASKAH DITERIMA SAMPAI DIPUBLISH

Artikel yang dikirimkan di jurnal ilmiah lingkungan kebumian, akan ditelaah oleh minimum 2 orang Mitra Bestari. Keputusan diterima-tidaknya naskah menjadi wewenang tim redaksi, berdasarkan pertimbangan-pertimbangan dari Mitra Bestari. Apabila pertimbangan 2 orang Mitra Bestari belum cukup untuk menjadi dasar keputusan maka naskah akan ditelaah oleh mitra bestari ke-3

Pengambilan keputusan penerimaan naskah dilakukan dalam forum sidang Dewan Penyunting.

Pemeriksaan unsur-unsur plagiasi akan dilakukan dengan menggunakan bantuan Google Scholar dan turnitin.

 

Screening for plagiarism

Plagiasi adalah bentuk pelanggaran etik akademik yang sangat perlu dihindari dalam proses penerbitan jurnal. praktek plagiasi banyak dilakukan, biasanya karena tuntutan kenaikan jabatan atau pangkat. Apabila diartikan secara umum plagiasi merupakan bentuk kegagalan penulis dalam publikasi karya ilmiah, karena biasanya praktek plagiasi merupakan akuisisi ide/karya orang lain. Jadi penulis secara sengaja menggunakan bahasa, ide, dan material lain tanpa menyebutkan sumbernya, dengan kata lain penulis ingin mengelabui pembaca bahwa yang ditulis merupakan bahasa atau ide penulis. Hal ini mungkin disebabkan oleh kurangnya pemahaman peneliti terhadap praktek-praktek melakukan sitasi dengan baik.
Plagiasi juga termasuk menerjemahkan satu karya ilmiah dari satu Bahasa ke Bahasa lain, untuk kemudian diakuisisi oleh yang bukan penulis sebenarnya. Jurnal Ilmiah Lingkungan Kebumian menggunakan perangkat Turnitin dan Grammarly untuk proses pengecekan plagiasi manuskrip. Plagiasi dibagi menjadi beberapa jenis yaitu:

  1. Plagiasi langsung, yaitu penyalinan karya ilmiah orang lain tanpa menyebutkan sumbernya.
  2. Self Plagiarism, yaitu penggunaan kembali materi manuskrip yang sebelumnya sudah pernah diterbitkan oleh penulis.
  3. Mosaic Plagiarism, yaitu penggunaan frase dari suatu sumber tanpa menyebutkan sumbernya.
  4. Accidental Plagiarism, yaitu penulis yang salah atau lupa menuliskan sumber tulisan, serta melakukan pengulangan kata tanpa menyebutkan sumber yang digunakan.

Tahapan pengecekan plagiasi dengan Turnitin sesuai pada Lampiran 5, terdiri atas:

  1. Siapkan file manuskrip yang akan diperiksa dalam format PDF atau doc, kemudian masuk ke web www.turnitin.com>> log in>> masukkan akun dan password.
  2. Apabila dimulai dengan kelas baru pilih “+Class”, isi bagian class setting sesuai kebutuhan, dan pilih submit.
  3. Pilih Classname.
  4. Klik Submit.
  5. Masukkan Submission title dengan Judul Manuskrip.
  6. Klik Choose from this Computer, cari file dan klik Open. Tunggu sampai selesai.
  7. Tunggu Proses pengecekan beberapa waktu (±1 jam).

Secara umum, persentase total plagiasi yang bisa diterima di setiap terbitan JILK adalah 15-20%, dan Kemenristek menerima toleransi persentase plagiasi hingga 25% tergantung dari konteks persentase kemiripan dari masing-masing sumber. Apabila hasil pengukuran menunjukkan persentase kemiripan terhadap satu sumber besar dan berurutan dalam satu kalimat atau paragraf, hal ini juga tidak bisa diterima, meskipun persentase total masih di bawah 15%.

  1. Editor JILK menyediakan panduan tentang plagiasi di dalam website JILK yang meliputi:
  2. Penyediaan panduan tentang originalitas dan authorship
  3. Prosedur penanganan plagiasi
  4. Meminta Reviewer untuk waspada terhadap adanya tanda-tanda plagiasi, seperti duplikasi data, gambar, kata, atau ide dan memberi tanda tentang informasi yang memerlukan referensi
Acuan yang digunakan adalah Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) tentang penanganan dan investigasi terhadap adanya plagiasi.

 

Publication ethics and Malpractice

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Ilmiah Lingkungan Kebumian is a peer-reviewed electronic national journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer  and the publisher (Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" University of Yogyakarta). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Geo Environmental Journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" University of Yogyakarta as publisher of Geo Environmental Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue
has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Department of Environmental Engineering of Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" University of Yogyakarta and Editorial Board will assist in
communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and
necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Lingkungan Kebumian is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.