Interrelationship of Millennial Generation Leadership Style Indicators at PLN Central Java & DIY Distribution Main Unit Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Approach

Muhdam Azhar, Mahfudz Mahfudz

Abstract


Manager at PT. PLN Persero has an important role in balancing internal relations with employees and external parties such as stakeholders. PT. PLN (Persero) Distribution Central Java and Yogyakarta D.I consists of a Unit Pelaksana Pelayanan Pelanggan (UP3) and Unit Layanan Pelanggan (ULP), ULP is directly related to the community and stakeholders. ULP Managers consists of Millennial Generation is 87% and Generation X 13%. The generation gap between Generation X and Generation Y (millennials) caused by the 7 years vacuum of recruitment, it causes of communication problems and Generation Y rapid adaptation to become young managers. Indicators identification are needed related to Generation Y's leadership style so that young managers are better prepared. Identification of the relationship between indicators is carried out using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method and then classifying indicators using the Multiplication Applied to a Classification (MICMAC) method. There are 7 indicators obtained from ISM: M1 (Communication Method), M2 (Media Communication), M3 (Managing Team Involvement), M4 (Resolving Internal Conflicts), M5 (Risk Management), M6 (Responding to Change), M7 (Managing Stakeholder). MICMAC analysis results are M7 in the Dependent Indicators Cluster, the other indicators from M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6 are in the Linkage Indicators Cluster.

Keywords


ISM; MICMAC; leadership; millennial generation

References


Akmalaputri, A. G., Yuniawan, A., & Djastuti, I. (2018). Gen Y Leader: Qualitative Phenomenology Leadership Studies In Pln Apd Jateng & Diy. Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 26(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.14710/jbs.26.1.62-75

Caulfield, J. L., & Senger, A. (2017). Perception is Reality: Change Leadership and Work Engagement Organizational Change And Work Engagement: The Mediating Effect Of Leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(7), 1–41.

Kota, S., Mishra, R. P., Krishna Jasti, N. V., & Kale, S. (2021). Sustainable Production System Critical Success Factors: An Interpretive Structural Modelling approach. Procedia CIRP, 98, 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.111

Ma, G., Jia, J., Ding, J., Shang, S., & Jiang, S. (2019). Interpretive Structural Model Based Factor Analysis of BIM Adoption in Chinese Construction Organizations. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071982

Primadasa, R., Sokhibi, A., & Tauhida, D. (2019). Interrelationship of Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) Performance Indicators for Palm Oil Industry in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 598(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012034

Raeesi, R., Dastranj, M., Mohammadi, S., & Rasouli, E. (2016). Understanding the Interactions among the Barriers to Entrepreneurship Using Interpretive Structural Modeling Understanding the Interactions among the Barriers to Entrepreneurship Using Interpretive Structural Modeling. June 2013. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n13p56

Rafiq, M., Naz, S., Martins, M., Mata, N., & Mata, P. N. (2021). A Study on Emerging Management Practices of Renewable Energy Companies after the Outbreak of Covid-19 : Using an Interpretive Structural Modeling ( ISM ) Approach.

Rony, Z. T. (2019). Generation Y Challenges in Becoming Innovative Leaders at Organization in the 21st Century. November. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1164.0982S919

Sage, A. P. (1977). Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems Sage, A.P. 1977 New York: McGraw-Hill. 1977.

Shrivastava, P., & Savolainen, T. (2017). Trust, Leadership Style and Generational Differences at Work-A Qualitative Study of a Three-Generation Workforce from Two Countries. Trust, Leadership Style and Generational Differences at Work ... NJB, 66(4).

Tran, D. M., Fallon, W., & Vickers, M. H. (2016). Leadership in Vietnamese state owned enterprises (SOEs). Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-10-2014-0116

Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing Subsystem Matrices in Structural Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-4(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408523

Wijono, S. (2006). Pengaruh Kepribadian Type A dan Peran Terhadap Stres Kerja Manajer Madya. Jurnal INSAN, 8(3), 188–197.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v14i2.6303

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Sekretariat :
Jurusan Teknik Industri
FTI UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta
d.a Jalan Babarsari 2 Tambakbayan Yogyakarta 55281
Telp. (0274) 486256
Website http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/opsi
email : jurnal.opsi@upnyk.ac.id

 

indexed by:

 
 
 


Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

View My Stats