Assessment of disassembly difficulty level of lithium battery pack by integrating Ease of Disassembly Metric (eDiM) and difficulty rating approach

Authors

  • Muqimuddin Muqimuddin Industrial Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
  • Dutho Suh Utomo Industrial Engineering Department, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Nik Mohd Farid Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia
  • Iin Armia Industrial Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
  • Aufar Fikri Dimyati Industrial Engineering Department, Telkom University, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Gad Gunawan Mechanical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Imron Zamzani Industrial Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v18i2.15580

Keywords:

Battery pack, Easy of disassembly, eDiM, Difficulty ratting

Abstract

The demand for batteries is expected to rise in line with the growing need for electric vehicles. As the number of electric vehicles increases, more battery waste will be generated, considering the average battery lifespan is only 10 to 15 years. If batteries are not recycled, this will lead to a significant accumulation of waste. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the ease of battery disassembly. This assessment can help manufacturers design batteries that are easier to disassemble. This study aims to determine the disassembly ease score and provide improvement recommendations using the Ease of Disassembly approach through eDiM and Difficulty Rating. The disassembly process is analyzed using the Ease of Disassembly Metric (eDiM) to evaluate difficulty levels based on standard disassembly operation time, and Difficulty Rating based on the indicators of Accessibility, Positioning, and Force. Based on the analysis results, the most difficult disassembly operations involve removing screws from the top cover, bottom cover, controller circuit, and BMS circuit, as well as detaching the nickel strip. The research findings indicate the presence of disassembly stages with low time values but high preference-based difficulty levels.

References

[1] GAIKINDO, “Indonesia Automotive Industry Data 2025 Q1 EV Market Report,” 2025.

[2] Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia Electric Vehicle Roadmap 2030. 2024.

[3] IEA, “Global EV Outlook 2024,” 2024.

[4] A. Purwani, S. M. Budijati, and H. M. Asih, “Management of battery waste recycling by electric motorbike workshops: A literature review,” OPSI, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 216, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v17i1.12173.

[5] A. Neri, M. A. Butturi, and R. Gamberini, “Sustainable management of electric vehicle battery remanufacturing: A systematic literature review and future directions,” J Manuf Syst, vol. 77, pp. 859–874, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.10.006.

[6] A. Pandey, S. Patnaik, and S. Pati, “Available technologies for remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling lithium-ion batteries: an introduction,” in Nano Technology for Battery Recycling, Remanufacturing, and Reusing, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 33–51. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91134-4.00020-0.

[7] M. Foster, P. Isely, C. R. Standridge, and M. M. Hasan, “Feasibility assessment of remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling of end of vehicle application lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 7, no. 3, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.3926/jiem.939.

[8] D. Salmon, C. W. Babbitt, G. A. Babbitt, and C. E. Wilmer, “A framework for modeling fraud in E-waste management,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 171, p. 105613, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105613.

[9] J. Hathaway, C. A. Contreras, R. Stolkin, M. E. Asif, and A. Rastegarpanah, “Technoeconomic Assessment of Electric Vehicle Battery Disassembly -- Challenges and Opportunities from a Robotics Perspective,” 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4803459.

[10] VDI 2243, “Recycling-Oriented Product Development,” 2002.

[11] J. Huang, C. Cui, W. Jiang, and L. Zhu, “Peony diagram modeling for improving the easy disassembly design of mobile electronic products,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1266, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85402-7.

[12] S. McGlothlin and E. Kroll, “Systematic estimation of disassembly difficulties: application to computer monitors,” in Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment ISEE (Cat. No.95CH35718), IEEE, 1995, pp. 83–88. doi: 10.1109/ISEE.1995.514955.

[13] P. Vanegas et al., “Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 135, pp. 323–334, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022.

[14] J. G. Erdmann, J. Koller, J. Brimaire, and F. Döpper, “Assessment of the disassemblability of electric bicycle motors for remanufacturing,” Journal of Remanufacturing, vol. 13, pp. 137–159, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13243-023-00124-1.

[15] L. Frizziero, G. Donnici, and M. Freddi, “Design for Disassembly combined with augmented reality for optimization of maintenance processes,” Frontiers in Sustainability, vol. 3, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3389/frsus.2022.1066448.

[16] H. S. Mok, H. J. Kim, and K. S. Moon, “Disassemblability of Mechanical Parts in Automobile for Recycling,” Computers ind. Engng, vol. 33, pp. 621–624, 1997.

[17] D. V. Bompa, M. Kariuki, V. Ungureanu, and A. Y. Elghazouli, “Disassembly capability and circularity potential of steel-timber floor connections,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 235, p. 109806, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2025.109806.

[18] G. Formentini et al., “A review of disassembly systems for circular product design,” J Clean Prod, vol. 506, p. 145459, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145459.

[19] T. Pulikottil, N. Boix Rodríguez, W. Sterkens, and J. R. Peeters, “Ease of robotic disassembly metric and information for digital product passports in flexible remanufacturing systems,” Sustain Prod Consum, vol. 58, pp. 123–139, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.008.

[20] X. Lai, N. Wang, B. Jiang, and T. Jia, “Choosing Recovery Strategies for Waste Electronics: How Product Modularity Influences Cooperation and Competition,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 20, p. 9035, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16209035.

[21] Paul. Vanegas et al., “Study for a method to assess the ease of disassembly of electrical and electronic equipment : method development and application to a flat panel display case study,” Publications Office, 2016. doi: 10.2788/130925.

[22] Peeters J. R., Tecchio P., Ardente F., Vanegas P., Coughlan D., and Duflou J.R., “eDIM: further development of the method to assess the ease of disassembly and reassembly of products Application to notebook computers,” 2018. doi: 10.2760/864982.

[23] F. De Fazio, C. Bakker, B. Flipsen, and R. Balkenende, “The Disassembly Map: A new method to enhance design for product repairability,” J Clean Prod, vol. 320, p. 128552, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128552.

[24] R. M. . Barnes, Motion and time study : design and measurement of work. Wiley, 1980.

[25] D. Curran-Everett, “Explorations in statistics: the log transformation,” Adv Physiol Educ, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 343–347, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1152/advan.00018.2018.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30