Evaluation of overall equipment effectiveness in the bottling line packaging process: A case study of the beverage company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v18i2.15590Keywords:
Overall equipment effectiveness , Six big losses , Bottling line , Packaging , Reduced speedAbstract
The effectiveness of equipment on the bottling packaging line greatly determines throughput and quality in the high-capacity beverage company. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is commonly used to assess performance and map sources of loss. This study evaluates beverage company bottling line using OEE and six big losses based on weekly data from weeks 14–26, including production output (good, reject, total), available time, planned downtime, and unplanned downtime. OEE components were calculated (Availability–Performance–Quality) and decomposed into breakdown, setup & adjustment, idling & minor stoppages, reduced speed, and defect. The results showed an average OEE of 69.35% (68.03–70.79%) with availability at 97.9%, performance at 70.9%, and quality at 99.9%. The dominant loss was reduced speed (≈28.48% of loading time), while setup & adjustment was 0.95%, breakdown 0.89%, idling & minor 0.24%, and defect 0.0895%, which were relatively small. The findings confirm performance as the main constraint; improvements are directed at stabilizing the Filler speed (pacemaker), line balancing & buffering, controlling micro-stops, and predictive maintenance of critical points. Improving performance is projected to be the most effective way to bring OEE closer to the 85% benchmark without compromising quality.
References
[1] B. Setiawan, F. Al Latif, and E. Rimawan, “Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Analysis: A Case Study in the PVC Compound Industry,” IJIEM - Indones. J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 14, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.22441/ijiem.v3i1.12066.
[2] S. O. Ongbali, S. A. Afolalu, S. Oladipupo, and M. Udo, “The roles of implementing key sustainable manufacturing strategy in production efficiency improvement of fast moving consumable goods: A review,” presented at the Technologies And Materials For Renewable Energy, Environment And Sustainability: TMREES21Gr, Athens, Greece, 2022, p. 020138. doi: 10.1063/5.0094062.
[3] V. Mhlanga, A. Telukdarie, and T. Katsumbe, “Evaluating the Impact of Continous Improvements through the Implementation of Total Preventative Maintenance in Confectionary Manufacturng Plant: A Case Study,” in 2023 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Monterrey, Mexico: IEEE, Jul. 2023, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.23919/PICMET59654.2023.10216851.
[4] N. C. Igbokwe and H. C. Godwin, “Maintenance Performance Evaluation and Downtime Analysis of Manufacturing Equipment in a Food Manufacturing Company,” J. Eng. Res. Rep., pp. 100–107, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.9734/jerr/2021/v20i1117413.
[5] M. R. Ullah, S. Molla, I. M. Siddique, A. A. Siddique, and Md. M. Abedin, “Optimizing Performance: A Deep Dive into Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) for Operational Excellence,” J. Ind. Mech., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 26–40, 2023, doi: 10.46610/JoIM.2023.v08i03.004.
[6] S. Enrique, “Reliability-Centered Maintenance Model to Improve OEE in a Mass-Consumption Food Company: A Case Study from Peru,” Int. J. Ind. Eng., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 23–33, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.14445/23499362/IJIE-V12I2P103.
[7] B. Mncwango and Z. L. Mdunge, “Unraveling the Root Causes of Low Overall Equipment Effectiveness in the Kit Packing Department: A Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control Approach,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 757, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/pr13030757.
[8] L. D. C. Ng Corrales, M. P. Lambán, M. E. Hernandez Korner, and J. Royo, “Overall Equipment Effectiveness: Systematic Literature Review and Overview of Different Approaches,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 18, p. 6469, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10186469.
[9] Fluminense Federal University, Volta Redonda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil et al., “Micro downtimes management in the Lean perspective: An empirical research in a production bottleneck,” Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 190–204, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.24867/IJIEM-383.
[10] A. Oke, J. Abafi, and B. Adewole, “Failure data analysis for preventive maintenance scheduling of a bottling company production system,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.22116/jiems.2020.227003.1355.
[11] J. A. Vázquez, J. B. Hernández, V. F. Lara, J. M. C. García, and E. S. Flores, “Proposal of queuing theory (waiting line models), for implementation in the production-labeling process of PET containers,” J. Eng. Res., vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 2–6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.22533/at.ed.3174182421068.
[12] G. K. Inyiama and S. A. Oke, “Maintenance downtime evaluation in a process bottling plant,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 229–248, May 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-12-2018-0340.
[13] F. A. Tonny, A. Maliha, M. I. Chayan, and M. D. Xames, “Optimization of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) factors: Case study of a vegetable oil manufacturing company,” Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 124–135, 2023, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2022.12.002.
[14] S. ALMashaqbeh and E. M. Hernandez, “Evaluation and Improvement of a Plastic Production System Using Integrated OEE Methodology: A Case Study,” Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 450–463, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.2478/mspe-2024-0042.
[15] S. Nakajima, Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance Preventative Maintenance Series, Berilustrasi. Productivity Press, 1988. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Introduction_to_TPM.html?id=XKc28H3JeUUC&redir_esc=y
[16] K. Jeong and D. T. Phillips, “Operational efficiency and effectiveness measurement,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1404–1416, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006223.
[17] S. S. W. Putra and B. D. Rahmawati, “Raw Mill Machine Effectiveness Measurement through the Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) Implementation,” OPSI, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 153, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v15i1.7729.
[18] M. Musyafa’ah and A. Sofiana, “Analysis of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) Application Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and Six Big Losses on Disamatic Machine PT. XYZ,” OPSI, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 56, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v15i1.6630.
[19] P. Muchiri and L. Pintelon, “Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 46, no. 13, pp. 3517–3535, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1080/00207540601142645.
[20] J. C. O. Ojeda et al., “Application of a Predictive Model to Reduce Unplanned Downtime in Automotive Industry Production Processes: A Sustainability Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 9, p. 3926, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17093926.
[21] B. K. Das, M. Niraj, and N. Singh, “A CASE STUDY OF USING TPM TO IMPROVE OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS IN THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY,” 2022.
[22] T. A. Putra, A. R. Farizki, and D. P. Setiawan, “Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) in Relation to The Production Planning Study in PT Pupuk Kujang Cikampek,” Manag. Entrep. Res. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–36, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.35899/merr.v1i1.82.
[23] Y. T. Prasetyo and F. C. Veroya, “An Application of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) for Minimizing the Bottleneck Process in Semiconductor Industry,” in 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE, Apr. 2020, pp. 345–349. doi: 10.1109/ICIEA49774.2020.9101925.
[24] T. N. Wiyatno and H. Kurnia, “Increasing Overall Equipment Effectiveness in the Computer Numerical Control Lathe Machines using the Total Productive Maintenance Approach,” OPSI, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 284, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v15i1.7284.
[25] T. N. Wiyatno, H. Kurnia, I. M. M. Putri, and R. Nugroho, “The combination of the kaizen approach with the Design of Experiment (DoE) method for improving quality of the bread and donut products in SMEs,” OPSI, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 12, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v17i1.11108.
[26] R. Shumaesi, D. M. Safitri, and A. Witonohadi, “Improving sustainability index through the implementation of total productive maintenance for the bending process in electrical manufacturing,” OPSI, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v18i1.13176.
[27] Y. E. Prawatya, N. H. Djanggu, and R. Rahmahwati, “Utilizing machine learning for predictive maintenance of production machinery in small and medium enterprises,” OPSI, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 91–100, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.31315/opsi.v18i1.13479.
[28] S. D. Luozzo, F. Starnoni, and M. M. Schiraldi, “On the relationship between human factor and overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): An analysis through the adoption of analytic hierarchy process and ISO 22400,” Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., vol. 15, p. 18479790231188548, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1177/18479790231188548.
[29] D. Junaedi, S. A. Lesmana, I. Roswandi, and A. Bramastro, “Performance Analysis of Filling Machine Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness Metric in Beverage Company,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res. Eng., vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 38–45, 2023, doi: 10.31695/IJASRE.2023.9.1.5.
[30] N. A. Danaish, R. Z. Jin, S. Akhani, and M. A. Akbar, “Implementation of OEEML in beverage bottling production line: a case study of Pakistan beverage industry,” Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., vol. 37, no. 1, p. 46, 2021, doi: 10.1504/IJISE.2021.112482.
[31] P. Dobra and J. Jósvai, “Assembly Line Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Prediction from Human Estimation to Supervised Machine Learning,” J. Manuf. Mater. Process., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 59, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/jmmp6030059.
[32] C. Phukapak, N. Pawaree, and N. Wichapa, “Comparison of desirability function (DF) and overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) with mathematical model for optimization in fruit juice production process,” Cogent Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2412365, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2024.2412365.
[33] E. Turanoglu Bekar, “Efficiency measurement based on novel performance measures in total productive maintenance (TPM) using a fuzzy integrated COPRAS and DEA method,” Front. Manuf. Technol., vol. 3, p. 1072777, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fmtec.2023.1072777.
[34] I. A. Osterroth and T. Voigt, “Energy Consumption of Beverage-Bottling Machines,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9880, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13179880.
[35] R. Sumargo and A. Makmur, “Automatic OEE Data Collection and Alert System for Food Industry,” sinkron, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2158–2167, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12953.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish articles in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright remains with the author and gives the Opsi journal the right as a priority to publish its articles with Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Which allows articles to be shared with acknowledgement of the author of the article and this journal as the place of publication.
- Authors can distribute their articles on a non-exclusive basis (e.g. in university repositories or books) with notification or acknowledgement of publication in Opsi journals.
- Authors are allowed to post their work online (e.g. on a personal website or in a university repository) before and after the submission process (see The Effect of Open Access)
This work is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
