A system dynamics model for energy transition: Substituting fossil fuels with renewable energy

Authors

  • Joko Sulistio Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
  • Winda Nur Cahyo Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
  • Daffa Alamsyah Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
  • Danang Setiawan Department of Sustainability and Planning, Faculty of Technical IT and Design, Aalborg University, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v19i1.16581

Keywords:

Elasticity of substitution, Renewable energy, Systems Dynamics, Energy transition, Willingness to Invest

Abstract

This study develops a system dynamics model to analyse the gradual transition from conventional to renewable energy in Indonesia. The model was built in Powersim Studio 10 and aims to capture the interplay among economic conditions, regulatory signals, and investor behaviour over time. The model represents two major components of the system: conventional energy demand and renewable energy development, connected by a substitution flow to illustrate the gradual transition. The model parameter remained hypothetical but was relevant to the literature on Indonesia's energy transition. The result indicates that the transition does not follow a linear path, but evolves through three phases: an initial acceleration, a stabilisation period, and a dynamic equilibrium phase. Sensitivity analysis shows that substitution elasticity alone does not directly determine the speed of transition. Instead, a transition dynamic emerged from the interaction between substitution elasticity and the relative willingness to invest between renewable and conventional energy technologies. The model indicates that a rapid transition occurs only when renewable energy is more economically attractive than fossil energy, whereas a high substitution elasticity is insufficient to accelerate the transition when conventional energy remains economically dominant. Rather than being used to obtain a precise forecast, the model provides a conceptual system-level framework for understanding how the energy system behaves with respect to interactions among different factors. The model’s structure can be used to identify which conditions matter among the combined effects of economics, regulation, and investment behavior in designing strategies for renewable energy transition.

References

[1] K. Auvinen, T. J. Lindroos, Å. Hedman, H. Savolainen, A. Lumijärvi, and P. Tainio, "Transition pathway for the city toward low-emission district heating system with heat auctions promoting third-party network access," Oxford Open Energy, Article vol. 3, 2024, Art no. oiae018, doi: 10.1093/ooenergy/oiae018.

[2] P. R. Indonesia, "Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 79 Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Energi Nasional," ed, 2014.

[3] I. Soejanto, R. M. N. Poerbaningrat, T. Ristyowati, and P. Puryani, "Investment analysis of solar power plant installation on the roof of the central business district office building with the best investment value," OPSI, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 52-64, 2024.

[4] W. W. Purwanto et al., "An integrated assessment of technological pathways and socioeconomic impacts for sustainable power system transition in Indonesia," Advances in Climate Change Research, Article vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1107-1120, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2024.11.005.

[5] Y. Xiong, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, and M. Wu, "Production, investment and financial plan for a “natural gas+” integrated energy enterprise: An assessment using system dynamics and multi-objective optimization model," Energy Rep., Article vol. 13, pp. 1859-1874, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.01.042.

[6] A. Blumberga, A. Gravelsins, and D. Blumberga, "Deliberation platform for energy transition policies: How to make complex things simple," Energies, Article vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, Art no. 90, doi: 10.3390/en15010090.

[7] A. Franco and C. Pagliantini, "Forecasting Electricity Demand in Renewable-Integrated Systems: A Case Study from Italy Using Recurrent Neural Networks," Electricity, Article vol. 6, no. 2, 2025, Art no. 30, doi: 10.3390/electricity6020030.

[8] D. H. Santoso, S. J. Santosa, and A. B. Sekaranom, "Dynamic modeling in environmental planning: A global synthesis of research addressing urban air quality," OPSI, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 252-269, 2025.

[9] A. Aslani, P. Helo, and M. Naaranoja, "Role of renewable energy policies in energy dependency in Finland: System dynamics approach," vol. 113, ed: Elsevier Ltd, 2014, pp. 758-765.

[10] M. Karbasioun, J. Li, and A. Hailu, "A system dynamics model for sustainable energy transition," Energy Rep., vol. 9, pp. 181–195, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.087.

[11] M. Hu, A. Leopold, and S. Pickl, "Transition towards renewable energy supply – A system dynamics approach," Energy Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 195–217, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-013-0086-3.

[12] K. Nair, S. Shadman, C. M. M. Chin, N. Sakundarini, E. H. Yap, and A. Koyande, "Developing a system dynamics model to study the impact of renewable energy in the short- and long-term energy security," (in English), Mater. Sci. Energy. Technol., Article vol. 4, pp. 391-397, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.mset.2021.09.001.

[13] D. H. Meadows, "Thinking in Systems: A Primer," ed: VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.

[14] S. Li, B. Zhang, and Y. Liu, "System dynamics simulation of policy synergy effects between renewable energy quotas and carbon emission trading," Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 4086, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084086.

[15] J. A. Leiva Vilaplana, G. Yang, E. Ackom, R. Monaco, and Y. Xue, "Dynamic Cost–Benefit Analysis of Digitalization in the Energy Industry," Engineering, Article vol. 45, pp. 174-187, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.005.

[16] S. Han, C. Lin, B. Zhang, and A. Farnoosh, "Projections and recommendations for energy structure and industrial structure development in China through 2030: A system dynamics model," Sustainability (Switzerland), Article vol. 11, no. 18, 2019, Art no. 4901, doi: 10.3390/su11184901.

[17] S. Isnandar, J. F. Simorangkir, K. M. Banjar-Nahor, H. T. Paradongan, and N. Hariyanto, "A Multiparadigm Approach for Generation Dispatch Optimization in a Regulated Electricity Market towards Clean Energy Transition," (in English), Energies, Article vol. 17, no. 15, 2024, Art no. 3807, doi: 10.3390/en17153807.

[18] J. D. Sterman, L. Siegel, and J. N. Rooney-Varga, "Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy," Environmental Research Letters, Article vol. 13, no. 1, 2018, Art no. 015007, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512.

[19] Y. D. Astanti, R. N. Putri, and L. Nafisah, "Dynamic system simulation of food Additives To Fulfill Consumer Needs and Increase Farmer Profits," Opsi, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2022.

[20] J. D. Morcillo, C. J. Franco, and F. Angulo, "Simulation of demand growth scenarios in the Colombian electricity market: An integration of system dynamics and dynamic systems," (in English), Applied Energy, Article vol. 216, pp. 504-520, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.104.

[21] T. Talitha and R. Berliyana, "Simulation model of production system using dynamic system approach to increase production capacity tofu factory," OPSI, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 228-237, 2022.

[22] M. Chang et al., "Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition," vol. 290, ed: Elsevier, 2021, p. 116731.

[23] T.-H. Le, Y. Chang, and D. Park, "Energy demand convergence in APEC: An empirical analysis," Energy Economics, vol. 65, pp. 32-41, 2017/06/01/ 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.013.

[24] T. Zhao, J. He, and D. Wu, "The substitution of fossil fuels for renewables in electricity generation: Evidence from system dynamics modeling," Energy, vol. 295, p. 130600, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.130600.

[25] H. Schwerin, "Long-run substitutability between fossil and renewable energy: global evidence 1800–2012," Empirical Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 129-148, 2025/07/01 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00181-025-02739-8.

[26] S. Feng, K. Zhang, and X. Peng, Elasticity of substitution between electricity and non-electric energy in the context of carbon neutrality in China. Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University, 2021.

[27] S. Aleti and G. Hochman, "Non-Constant Elasticity of Substitution and Intermittent Renewable Energy," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 321-359, 2020, doi: 10.1017/age.2020.7.

[28] E. Jonsson, "Historical substitution between renewable and fossil Energy," ed: SLU, Dept. of Economics, 2025.

[29] C. Li, L. Zhang, Z. Ou, and J. Ma, "Using system dynamics to evaluate the impact of subsidy policies on green hydrogen industry in China," (in English), Energy Policy, Article vol. 165, 2022, Art no. 112981, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112981.

[30] A. Osman et al., "Cost, environmental impact, and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: a review," Environmental Chemistry Letters, vol. 21, pp. 741-764, 2022-10-28 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01532-8.

[31] I. Ritzenhofen, J. Birge, and S. Spinler, "The structural impact of renewable portfolio standards and feed-in tariffs on electricity markets," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 255, pp. 224-242, 2016-05-06 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.061.

[32] J. Abrell, S. Rausch, and C. Streitberger, "The Economic and Climate Value of Flexibility in Green Energy Markets," Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 83, pp. 289-312, 2021-09-30 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10640-021-00605-6.

[33] M. Polemis and A. Spais, "Disentangling the drivers of renewable energy investments: The role of behavioral factors," Business Strategy and The Environment, vol. 29, pp. 2170-2180, 2020-03-05 2020, doi: 10.1002/bse.2493.

[34] I. Ramadhan and A. Purwani, "Developing stakeholders in the circular supply chain of EV batteries: Initiate strategy," OPSI, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 377-389, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30